SOLVED

11)When participants respond to cues from the experimenter, the study is affected by A)measurement reactivity. B)unobtrusive measurement reactivity. C)participant reactivity. D)experimenter reactivity. 12)An example of an ex post facto fallacy is A)”If we let this defendant off easy, then we’ll have to let everybody else off, too.” B)”This statement is untrue, because it was made by a man who is a mental patient.” C)”All psychologists drive Volvos; therefore, every time I see a Volvo, it must be driven by a psychologist.” D)”Juvenile delinquents carry knives; therefore, carrying a knife leads to juvenile delinquency.” 13)If a researcher emits uncontrolled verbalizations during research, it is likely to lead to A)the ex post facto fallacy. B)the quid pro quo fallacy. C)experimenter reactivity. D)a recording contract. 14)In which of the following research areas would naturalistic observation be difficult? A)School children’s behavior on playgrounds. B)Marital conversation during intercourse. C)Visitor behavior at football games. D)Basketball court usage at hospitals. 15)Rosenhan may have made the error of A)drawing high-constraint conclusions from low-constraint research. B)inferring causality from high-constraint research. C)using a nonrepresentative sample. D)using inappropriate statistical tests. 16)Rosenhan (1973) concluded that in order to gain admission to a psychiatric hospital, a person has only to A)show proof of adequate insurance. B)report hearing voices. C)refuse to speak to intake personnel. D)request admission stating “I don’t feel right.” 17)Most of the pseudopatients in Rosenhan’s (1973) classic study were diagnosed with schizophrenia. This diagnosis A)was inconsistent with the symptoms presented by the pseudopatients. B)was given to 90% of patients admitted to that hospital. C)was consistent with the symptoms presented by the pseudopatients. D)was inconsistent with the treatment (e.g., psychopharmacology) given to the pseudopatients. 18)Rosenhan’s (1973) conclusions may have been A)too strong for the constraint level of the study. B)too weak for the constraint level of the study. C)based on data collected in the lab, not in a natural setting.Â